Readiness markdown structure #42

Closed
opened 2026-08-03 22:41:56 +00:00 by TheAnachronism · 1 comment

Part of #41

Question

How should the docs/ release-readiness markdown be organized — filename/path, section outline, and how criteria-plus-rationale is presented — so a later implement effort can consume it as the handoff artifact?

Part of #41 ## Question How should the docs/ release-readiness markdown be organized — filename/path, section outline, and how criteria-plus-rationale is presented — so a later implement effort can consume it as the handoff artifact?
Author
Owner

Resolution

Path: docs/1.0-beta-readiness.md

Top-level shape (mvp-spec-like):

  1. Goal
  2. Non-goals
  3. Product polish bar (includes a dated Known issues inventory section)
  4. Engineering maturity bar
  5. Sideload packaging bar
  6. Acceptance — outcome-oriented happy path + “all bar musts pass”

Criterion form: each item is a must-line followed by a short why. Concrete must-lines come from later criteria tickets; this ticket locks only the skeleton and presentation rules.

Known issues: live as an inventory section inside the polish bar (not a separate markdown file, not tracker-only).

## Resolution **Path:** `docs/1.0-beta-readiness.md` **Top-level shape** (mvp-spec-like): 1. Goal 2. Non-goals 3. Product polish bar (includes a dated **Known issues** inventory section) 4. Engineering maturity bar 5. Sideload packaging bar 6. Acceptance — outcome-oriented happy path + “all bar musts pass” **Criterion form:** each item is a must-line followed by a short why. Concrete must-lines come from later criteria tickets; this ticket locks only the skeleton and presentation rules. **Known issues:** live as an inventory section inside the polish bar (not a separate markdown file, not tracker-only).
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.